找回密碼
 申請討論區帳戶
查看: 4056|回復: 3

星空photo-taking心得一問

  [複製鏈接]
發表於 2012-5-3 19:22:48 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
我想問通常用dslr影星係咪多數用大光圈定焦/fisheye/廣角鏡?如果用單支長鏡300mm以上or macro鏡可以影星嗎?
發表於 2012-5-4 09:54:46 | 顯示全部樓層
我想問通常用dslr影星係咪多數用大光圈定焦/fisheye/廣角鏡?如果用單支長鏡300mm以上or macro鏡可以影星嗎? ...
riricky815 發表於 2012-5-3 19:22


This all depends on what is your target.

If you want to take image of large sky area, like the Milkyway, large constellation (like Canis Major), etc. you will need a wide angle lens.
On the other hand, if you want to image small objects (by small I mean small in angular size, such as planets, etc) then you will need a lens with very long focus.

Surely any lens will be useful, depending on your target object.  A 300mm lens will be good for small constellations, large nebula (such as M42).

pts
 樓主| 發表於 2012-5-4 18:55:56 | 顯示全部樓層
我見好多人都用cannon,但我個部係nikon,影出泥有咩唔同?同埋d人改機影,咁nikon有無?and用dslr影出泥同用天文專用ccd 加telescope又有咩分別?
發表於 2012-5-5 09:52:46 | 顯示全部樓層
我見好多人都用cannon,但我個部係nikon,影出泥有咩唔同?同埋d人改機影,咁nikon有無?and用dslr影出泥同用天 ...
riricky815 發表於 2012-5-4 18:55


There is not much difference in Nikon or Canon, except for the availability of modification for Canon, and in the RAW images.  The RAW in Nikon is not really RAW as Nikon did some noise reduction even in the RAW.  The RAW in Canon is truely RAW.

Astronomical CCD's are designed for long-exposures, with cooling to reduce thermal noise (this is not usually available for DSLR's).  In addition, the software that comes with astro ccds are much more suitable for our purposes.


pts
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 申請討論區帳戶

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|香港天文學會

GMT+8, 2024-4-26 21:09 , Processed in 0.011826 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表