如何分辨 科學 和 偽科學

mca

如何分辨科学和伪科学


相關文章
http://www.dxy.cn/portal/article/440/441/2450_1.html

http://resources.edb.gov.hk/phys ... p;%20Falsifiability(Chinese).doc


AC

mca

Second Link  is

科學與〝可證偽性〞


(LLH於11/2/2009 10:04修正了上述連結)

[ 本帖最後由 LLH 於 2009-2-11 10:03 編輯 ]

mca

在這裡的 hyperlink縱亂了碼，如果開不到文件，請試
http://www.alanchuhk.com/Science_Falsifiability.doc

ericng

Dear Alan,

THank you for the sharing.

This is a very good guideline to differentiate between science and pseudoscience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

Those pseudoscience follower who does not want to put efforts in systematic way to learn new thing as it takes time and efforts. Thus rely on the belief or faith on the hypothesis but not evidence based.

Eric

Dennis

從以上說法，請問比如 normal distribution 等model 及 quantitative research 等算不算是偽科學呢？個人認為都不是 evidence based 而是 projection based....

ericng

Did I say so???. I did not find my statement has any hint leading to your question or comment. Statistical method certainly an important (common) tool in doing scientific research.

If you like, then I shall rephrase it as pseudoscience "solely" relies on the belief or faith on the hypothesis.

[ 本帖最後由 ericng 於 2009-6-3 21:46 編輯 ]