如何分辨 科學 和 偽科學
如何分辨科学和伪科学http://www.alanchuhk.com/Science_pseudo.jpg
相關文章
http://www.dxy.cn/portal/article/440/441/2450_1.html
http://resources.edb.gov.hk/physics/articleDoc/InterestingTopics/01Science%20&%20Falsifiability(Chinese).doc
AC Second Linkis
科學與〝可證偽性〞
(LLH於11/2/2009 10:04修正了上述連結)
[ 本帖最後由 LLH 於 2009-2-11 10:03 編輯 ] 在這裡的 hyperlink縱亂了碼，如果開不到文件，請試
http://www.alanchuhk.com/Science_Falsifiability.doc Dear Alan,
THank you for the sharing.
This is a very good guideline to differentiate between science and pseudoscience.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience
Those pseudoscience follower who does not want to put efforts in systematic way to learn new thing as it takes time and efforts. Thus rely on the belief or faith on the hypothesis but not evidence based.
Eric 從以上說法，請問比如 normal distribution 等model 及 quantitative research 等算不算是偽科學呢？個人認為都不是 evidence based 而是 projection based.... Did I say so???. I did not find my statement has any hint leading to your question or comment. Statistical method certainly an important (common) tool in doing scientific research.
If you like, then I shall rephrase it as pseudoscience "solely" relies on the belief or faith on the hypothesis.
[ 本帖最後由 ericng 於 2009-6-3 21:46 編輯 ]
頁:
[1]